Re: Octha or Ohta?

From: stlatos
Message: 68514
Date: 2012-02-08

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Torsten" <tgpedersen@...> wrote:

> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "stlatos" <stlatos@> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Torsten" <tgpedersen@> wrote:
> > >
> >
> > > I am sure y. cn. als. expl. ths.:
> > >
> > > Or�l & Stol'bova
> > > HSED 2066 *q.of- "hoof"
> > > Sem *h_upp "hoof": Arab h_uff-, Hss h_ef, Mhr h_ef, Shh h_af.
> > > WCh *q.waf- "hoof: Hs kwa:fa, Ang kwe:p.
> >
> >
> > That is borrowed into Khow, not native:
> > q�f = claw/talon Kh;

>
> That is interesting.
> I assume Khow is a language?


The native cognate is sapùk. I mention Khow (also called Khowar) [the l. of the Khow people; named the same as Kohistan; rel. to kaufa- = mt OP; ko:h P;] all the time because of its vast importance in Ind-Iran. studies (branching, timing of migrations, languages contacted, etc.). It has not received the needed attention from linguists, mostly because of Morgenstierne's mistakes in studying and describing it.


> Orël & Stolbobova don't mention it.
> Would you like to explain the appearance of a seeming cognate of the IE "hoof" word in AfroAsiatic languages?
>


Though I haven't studied it closely, I assume the changes:

*
kapxYuko+
kapxYu o+ dis.
kapxYw o+
kapxYwo+
kaxYpwo+
xo:pa+


were matched:

*
kapxYuko+
kapxYu o+ dis.
kapxYw o+
kapxYwo+
kapHxYwo+
kxYwapHo+
kxYwapHpHo+
kxYwapHFo+
kxYwapHxWo+
etc.
q'Xwap'q'Xwà


That is if they are desc. from the same source; a borrowing between such l. isn't impossible, which seems to be the souce of:

kapí- = ape/monkey, kapí- \ kapilá- = brownish/reddish RV S; qephi Eg;