From: stlatos
Message: 68079
Date: 2011-09-27
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "tgpedersen" <tgpedersen@> wrote:Actually, almost all Gmc ww / jj came from PIE wx / yxY / etc., and apparently xw / etc., if they underwent opt. met. as in:
> >
> > --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "tgpedersen" <tgpedersen@> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > I collected what I could of suspicious-looking pairs of Gmc. words
> > > of similar meaning assuming an alternation w-/g- and j-/g- between a
> > > substrate and Gmc proper. First it should be mentioned
> > >
> > > 1) NGmc has 'Verschärfung' *-ww- > -gw- and *-jj- > *-gj-,
> > > Gothic has 'Verschärfung' *-ww- > -gw- and *-jj- > *-dj-
> > >At the time L w- > v- had occurred, but gw- was still very common, so in choosing how to represent words with lacking w- either was possible, and one was chosen w/out regard to previous Gmc w > xW > GW , etc.
> > > 2) the Romance languages rendered Gmc w- as gw-.
> > >
> Looking for something else I found this:
> http://www.duden.de/rechtschreibung/gokeln
> "mit Feuer spielen"/"play with fire"
>
>
> Torsten
>