From: Torsten
Message: 67262
Date: 2011-03-19
>A bit of Greek to increase confusion (or ?)
> (unicode UTF-8)
>
> >>"cioban" which should be pronounced as "tschöban" in German..
>
> Not at all. In the Romanian spelling cioban, _i_ is inserted after
> _c_ only to signalize: "pronounce it [Ä]!". There is no [jo] there
> whatsoever. (Explanation: there has been a weird habit for Romanians
> outside the Carpathian "arch" range to think of _io_ [jo] as
> an awkward substitution for _ö_; the same applies to a _iu_ [ju]
> for "ü". Such people tend to pronounce Köln [Kjoln], München
> [miunhÉn].)
>
> The Turkish spelling of it is _çoban_ (ç [Ä]). Variant in
> Turkic languages: _çaban_. Also _Ãolpan_ "Venus, morning star",
> as in _Ãolpan yıldızı_ or _Ãoban yıldızı_ (in Turkish "shepherd's
> star") [tÊoban; tÊolpan jɨldɨzɨ] or [jɯldɯzɯ].
>
> One of the _Pecheneg_ tribes described by emperor Constantine
> Porphyrogenitus around AD 950 had the name _Ãoban_ or _Ãaban_
> (in Greek rendered as _Tsopon_), led by the princeling or kagan
> Bata, followed by Bula. (In those times, the Tchobans' realm
> was by the Don river (in Russia). In that century, Pechenegs
> were having manifold contacts & interactions with the Varangians
> of the _GarðarÃki_ (seemingly some Varangians were included in
> the "rank and file" of Pechenegs as well as of Proto-Hungarians).