From: Torsten
Message: 67161
Date: 2011-02-11
>Oops, not quite accurate, he actually mentions the Sitones in the preceding paragraph:
>
>
>
> > > When was the last mentioning of the Bastarnian population?
> > > AFAIK during Attila's period. Afterwards it must be
> > > assimilated into other Germanic or German populations.
> >
> > I was being imprecise. The Bastarnians in PoieneÅti-LukaÅ¡evka who
> > disappear in mid-1st century BCE according to CriÅan were the
> > northern tribes (Atmoni and Sidoni in Strabo)
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bastarnae
> > The southern Peucini stayed on longer, as you mention.
> >
> > > But a Germanic population of the 1st, 2nd, 3rd century
> > > to go exactly through the same linguistic transformation
> > > as those Germanic idioms that turned German, yet in
> > > the absence of permanent links with the future German
> > > (diutisk) populations from the 3rd or 5th century until
> > > the 11th century? Methinks this would have been impossible.
> >
> > By that time, the Atmoni and Sidoni would have either been in
> > Germanic-speaking Przeworsk-land
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Przeworsk_culture
> > or have left with Ariovistus to invade the land of the Helvetii in
> > what later became southern Germany, ie Swabia and Bavaria.
> >
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bastarnae
> Strabo's
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geographica (published 9 BCE)
> still mentions the three subtribes Atmoni, Sidoni and Peucini.
> Tacitus'
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germania_(book) (published 98 CE)
> knows only the southern tribe of the Peucini.
> 'The Peucini, however, who are sometimes called Bastarnae,...'
> (Germania 46) shows that by then the Atmoni and Sidoni were
> history beyond recollectable memory.