Re: 'dyeus' chronology

At 3:18:47 PM on Saturday, October 9, 2010, shivkhokra wrote:

> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Brian M. Scott"
> <bm.brian@...> wrote:

>> At 2:53:50 PM on Saturday, October 9, 2010, shivkhokra
>> wrote:

>>> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Francesco Brighenti"
>>> <frabrig@> wrote:

>>>> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "shivkhokra"
>>>> <shivkhokra@> wrote:

>>>>> We should also think about why on Crete the palaces were
>>>>> called PUR on linear B tablets and not the greek term
>>>>> polis. Pur is what palaces are in Vedas.

>>>> If you are referring to the term "pu-ro", attested
>>>> repeatedly in Linear B tablets, that is considered a
>>>> place-name (Greek Pulos, i.e. Pylos), not a word for
>>>> 'palace'.

>>> No one doubts that Vedic Pur and Greek Polis are one and
>>> the same. Crete had palace names such as ma-to-ro puro,
>>> rauratijo puro etc. Compare such names to how palace
>>> founded cities are named in India: Udaipur, Jodhpur etc.

>> You appear to have completely missed Francesco's point,
>> which is that all of this is completely irrelevant to Linear
>> B <pu-ro> 'Pulos', which cannot have the same source.

> No. I have given two examples: matoropuro and rauratijo
> puro

And *again* you miss the point. If you cannot read any
better than that, you're wasting everyone's time.

> which are different town/palace names on crete.

Not on Crete.

Brian