From: Brian M. Scott
Message: 66651
Date: 2010-09-25
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Brian M. Scott"The first element is derived from PGmc. *arwa-; attested
> <bm.brian@...> wrote:
>> At 4:24:33 AM on Thursday, September 23, 2010, Torsten
>> wrote:
>> [...]
>>> Another -gist for -gast
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Runic_inscriptions
>>> 'Schretzheim case:
>>> arogisd / alaguþleuba : dedun
>>> ("Arogast / Alaguth [and] Leubo (Beloved) made it")'
>> (I realize that you're just quoting your source, but that
>> should obviously be <Leuba>, not <Leubo>.) That's one
>> possible interpretation, but there are others, even
>> taking <arogisd> as a single name or word. However, most
>> of the interpretations that I've seen divide it as
>> <arogis d>. The first element is then the dithematic
>> masculine name <Arogi:s> (Langob. <Arogis>, OHG
>> <Arugis>), which is found as <arugis> in the runic
>> inscription on the disk fibula from Kirchheim unter Teck,
>> also in the south. The <d> can then be interpreted as an
>> abbreviation for <deda>, a usage found elsewhere. The
>> interpretation still depends on that of <leuba>; one
>> possibility is 'Arogis m(ade) (and) Alagu(n)th (and)
>> Leuba made (the gift)'.
> Thanks, nice to know. What is the received interpretation
> of the two elements of Arogi:s?