From: george knysh
Message: 66355
Date: 2010-07-21
--- On Wed, 7/21/10, Torsten <tgpedersen@...> wrote:
--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, george knysh <gknysh@...> wrote:
>
>
> --- On Mon, 7/19/10, Torsten <tgpedersen@...> wrote:
>
> George Knysh:
> > > BTW you still haven't provided anything concrete about the
> > > inventory of the 'upper layer' Przeworsk inhumations of that
> > > period. This is crucial if you wish to establish a "Dandarian"
> > > or other "Scythian" connection.
>
>
> GK: 1. What is required is an evaluation of the full inventory,
> not merely mention of sporadic objects of various provenance.
*****GK: I'm talking in general here, not with respect to your Przeworsk cremation grave, which has nothing to do BTW with your "Dandarian invasion" fantasies (the latest of your Snorrist garbs).*****
I wouldn't interpret 'analogous' to mean 'sporadic' and 'of various provenance'.
> E.g. one "Roman" object among dozens or hundreds of other objects
> does not make the burial "Roman".
'Found with a J5 type target handle, a flame blade, cinerary urn of I group. Both complete vases and sherds found there, too' doesn't mean "dozens or hundreds of other objects".
> 2. The specifics of the burial rite (e.g.shape of the pit, position
> of the body et sim.) are also significant.
Yes, in the case you want to establish commmon origin of these with other graves elsewhere.
> Simple "inhumation" is not a sufficient specific final identifier,
> though it is OK "for starters". This is elementary archaeology.
They seem to be cremation, as you noted.
*****GK: And thus irrelevant.*****
> Roman swords in Przeworsk:
>
> http://wwwg.uni-klu.ac.at/archeo/archeost/66sword.htm
> The interesting ones should be the ones which are dated to
> immediately before period B1, noted here LL/B1 (LL = Late Latène?)
>
> For the absolute chronology of the period designations see http://bartoszkontny.pradzieje.pl/index_pl.php?content=time_of_war_01
>
> There are three such swords, namely item 10, one with a Roman
> inscription, ALLIUS PA. Allius is a Roman nomen
>
> GK: The information here provided is that these swords came from
> Noricum via Czechia and middle Silesia, and that the Italian
> craftsman was of Etruscan origin.
That is not 'information', that is their hypothesis, and you know that.
*****GK: I tend to believe the opinion of professionals a tad more than that of a Snorrist ideologist.*****
> The three swords mentioned are 'an earlier type of roman SPATHA
> sword'. The spatha is otherwise thought of as originating in the
> first century BCE:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spatha
> but see the alternative explanations in
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Spatha
>
> GK: But the most significant point here is that the swords are
> from cremation rather than inhumation burials.****
OK
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/11301
Etc
****GK: Apart from confirming your unrelenting Snorrism it is difficult to see what relevance your message 11301 possesses.*****
Torsten
****GK: P.S. Or are you no longer interested in Przeworsk inhumations?***** (=:)))