From: Koenraad
Message: 66194
Date: 2010-06-10
>Arnaud's review boils down to repeating endlessly how Talageri works outside the established paradigm, though this was agreed upon by all parties concerned from the start. Scholars working outside the presents ideological climate, who have not been forewarned that Shrikant is the bad guy whose positions have to be buried by any means, will find it easy to decide whose language is the more hysterical, Arnaud's or Shrikant's. The losers are those among you who allow themselves to be dissuaded from acquainting themselves directly with Shrikant's analysis of the Vedic, Avestan and Mitannic data.
>
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, johnvertical@ wrote:
> >
> > > Arnaud's review of Talageri's book, some long extracts from which
> are reproduced (and hysterically commented on -- but not at all
> "rebutted" as you wrongly claim!) in the reply by Talageri you have
> uploaded in the Files section, is one of the best critical writings of
> his I have ever read.
> >
> >