From: Joao S. Lopes
Message: 65962
Date: 2010-03-12
2010/3/11 Piotr Gasiorowski <gpiotr@... edu.pl>:
> W dniu 2010-03-11 00:54, bmscotttg pisze:Since we are at this topic:
>>
>> Can't be: OLat <honos> ~ <honoris> is from <honos> ~ *<honosis>
>> via rhotacism.
>
> ....as demonstrated not only by early Latin <honos>, but also by
> derivatives such as <honestus> (< *-es-to-).
>
> Piotr