Re: Res: [tied] Re: Latin Honor < ?

W dniu 2010-03-11 12:27, Joao S. Lopes pisze:

>
>
> I know, but... how if honos, honoris came from *honor, honoris, through
> analogy to s-stems? I know it's a bit unlikely.
>
> Forgetting *ner-, honos- would point to gHon-o(:)s ? If we look for
> another s-stems to find parallel formations, amo:r (*amo:s) ~ ama:re ~
> ami:cus, we would have hono:s ~ *hona:re ~ honi:cus. IE *gHen-?
>
> Keeping the idea of prefix *ho-, we'd try *g^Ho-no:s, maybe <
> *g^Ho-hon-o:s, g^Ho-won-o:s... ? Or a variation of onus (honos-)
> "burden", with an aberrant h- for IE h-?

I've seen it being connected with Goth. ansts 'grace, favour', which, if
correct, would imply a secondary /h-/.

Piotr