From: Torsten
Message: 65726
Date: 2010-01-21
>These do
> > > > Occam would love me. So much explained from so few entibus!
> > > > Whatever extra in the sociology/ethnology department has to
> > > > be accepted would have to be assumed to explain the
> > > > distribution of *kaN-t-, and further *saxn- (vel sim).
> > > >
> > >
> > > Hmmm. It seems you're not counting insufficiently estabilish'd
> > > sound laws and propagation pathways as "assumptions"? And
> > > you'll need a ton of both to make those complexes work.
> >
> > Naah, I'll just claim they're wanderwords and then claim the same
> > privilege for them of exemption from that stuff that they enjoy.
>
> What privilege where? I'm not aware of any that require a handful
> of idiosyncratic innovations every other step.
> (Wanderwords, unlike your complexes, also come with narroly defined*kan,-t- "organized set of people, hundertschaft (cavalry)"
> semantics related to some specific technological innovation.)