From: george knysh
Message: 65685
Date: 2010-01-18
--- On Mon, 1/18/10, Torsten <tgpedersen@...> wrote:
--- In cybalist@... s.com, george knysh <gknysh@...> wrote:
>
> --- On Sun, 1/17/10, Torsten <tgpedersen@ ...> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Here's the deal: there wasn't any 'local aristocracy' in
> > Przeworsk to influence.
> >
> > GK: There are top dogs in the simplest villages. There are
> > leaders in the most primitive warbands.
>
> How come they left no specific trace then?
>
> GK: How do we know they didn't? Perhaps our interpretation of
> old gravesites is prejudiced.
George, you are amazing.
> Henryk Lowmianski once argued (in his work on Polish origins) that
> in some ancient cultures (where the aristocracy had not yet become
> gradated) the very fact of being buried constituted proof of
> "distinguished status" (with richness of inventory a rather late
> development) , whereas the hoi polloi didn't rate that and their
> remains were diposed of in other ways...
Vultures? Ragout?
****GK: Or, less dramatically, cremation "in the wind"....****
> Perhaps we should think about this.*****
Erh, OK.
Torsten