From: Torsten
Message: 65651
Date: 2010-01-15
> --- On Thu, 1/14/10, Torsten <tgpedersen@...> wrote:In the archaeological sense, yes. I should have been more precise: The area of the present Germany and Scandinavia.
>
> > > GK: My point is that you have not adduced any evidence proving
> > > that the Germanic language spread from a "Przeworsk" area
> > > heartland, either from a linguistic or from any other point of
> > > view.
> >
> > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/56782
> >
> > GK: Exactly. Message 56782 invites you to demonstrate the
> > Przeworsk area as the "locus a quo" for the spread of Germanic.
>
> Well, read the thread then.
>
> ****GK: There is nothing in the thread proving your points about
> the expansion of Germanic from Przeworsk.****
>
> Germania was colonized from the area of the upper Elbe,
>
> ****GK: This would be the Suevan expansion begun by Ariovistus and
> continued by others? But as has been known for a long time, the
> Elbe Germanic Suevans were not the only Germanics.
> And they did not expand (at least there is no known archaeoloicalIt all is, including the supposed null hypothesis that the present Germanic-speaking area (minus England) was the home of the whole line of ancestors of the Germanic languages.
> evidence to that effect) either to the northeast or to the
> southeast (into Oksywie-Wielbark or into Bastarnia), or into
> Scandinavia.****
>
>
> which itself earlier was colonized by an upper caste coming from
> the Przeworsk culture.
>
> ****GK: (1) This is an unproved assumption.
> (2) Przeworsk itself was earlier Germanized by Yastorf elementsThat's where I'm not so certain. If Celtic was an elite language, who knows what language the masses of Przeworsk spoke before the invasion of the inhumating people.
> coming in from the West and Northwest.*****