Re: Bastarnae - Scordisci, similar languages

I think suffix -isk is in name Scordisci. Such suffix is in Romanian language. For example words "marka romaneska" means "romanian trade mark". Also this suffix is in Lithuanian language. For example words "rumunishkas prekes zhenklas" means "romanian trade mark". Was this suffix in Celtic language? What else languages had it too?

Aigius

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, george knysh <gknysh@...> wrote:
>
>
> --- On Wed, 10/28/09, Torsten <tgpedersen@...> wrote:
>
> Titus Livius, Ab Urbe Condita XL, 57
>
> 'the Scordisci will let the Bastarnae pass without difficulty; their languages and customs are, after all, very similar, and the Scordisi may well join up with the Bastarnae, seeing that the latter are going in search of spoils to a very wealthy people' (quoted from Shchukin).
>
> Latin: 'nec enim aut lingua aut moribus [aequales] abhorrere',
>
> http://www.thelatin library.com/ livy/liv. 40.shtml# 57
>
> "not dissimilar" is probably better.
>
> ****GK: I think this was touched upon before. My own position is that the early Bastarnae were the Galatae+Sciri mentioned in the Protogen Decree. An alliance of Celts and Germanics (basically, with other associates). Earlier writers viewed the Celtic component as dominant. This was still apparently the case for the time period of the Livy quote above (first half of the 2nd c. BCE). As time went on it is the Germanic component which won out.****
>
>
>
> Torsten
>