From: Torsten
Message: 65132
Date: 2009-09-25
>I hadn't thought of that, but it makes a lot of sense.
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Torsten" <tgpedersen@> wrote:
> >
> > > > > I have argued for years that <lacus> and <mare> are
> > > > > geomorphic loanwords into Latin from a language of the
> > > > > Illyrian type.
> > > > >
> > > > > Meillet's theory of /a/ as a marker for 'mots populaires'
> > > > > is rather outdated.
> > > >
> > > > It was more like an observation, I think.
> > >
> > > Colored by the difficulty of fitting many of these words, e.g.
> > > Lat. <cardo:> 'hinge', into the e/o/zero ablaut paradigm. But
> > > further developments in 20th-century IE studies have removed
> > > much of the apparent trouble with the /a/.
> >
> > I'll agree with 'schwa secundum' in phonetically difficult
> > contexts, as Jens proposed.
> >
> > > To me it creates much more trouble to assume that
> > > Indo-Europeans had a clearly defined "Hochsprache" and
> > > "Niedersprache", with the low-brow rabble clumsily uttering /a/
> > > rather than the refined /e/ and /o/ of the upper class.
> >
> > Why not? Most societies today have similar shibboleths. All
> > mobile steppe societies divide people into those who matter (us)
> > and the others (sedentary) who shouldn't get ideas. Besides, most
> > likely the PIE thematic vowel /e|o|zero/ was PPIE /a/ (that way
> > -i, -u and thematic stems were originally -i, -u and -a stems).
> > If late, PIE invasions overran early, PPIE invasions, you'd get
> > exactly such a vowel-marked Hochsprache/Niedersprache mix. Kuhn's
> > 'Ablaut, /a/ und Altertumskunde'
> > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/30032
> > which I recommend, notes such a temporal procession in loans, but
> > ascribes it to 'fashion'. Besides, there is not really such a big
> > difference between the sociolect and the dialect(loan)
> > hypotheses, only the assumption of a conquest.
>
> I have a copy of that paper, which I should probably revisit. I
> agree the Old PIE thematic vowel was */a/, and I believe this was
> preserved as */a/ in later PIE in heavy syllables in non-verbal
> forms. For example Lat. <falx> 'sickle', Sicel <zagkle:>,
> Liguro-Latin <daculum>, Gallo-Rom. dial. <dal>, <daille>, etc. (by
> dissimilation from *dalklom vel sim.) have what I regard as
> original /a/ in the noun *dHalgH-s, *dHalgH-os, etc. corresponding
> to the verbal root *dHelgH-.
> Likewise <albus> 'white' in my view has an old /a/.Strange things are happening around supposed PIE *albh- (*algW- ?)
>AFAI can see, all we need to assume to make that scenario work is that at a certain time the hearth of the nomad attacks developed ablaut.
> And while I may not be able to disprove the notion of ablauting
> PIE-speakers overrunning earlier non-ablauting speakers, I find it
> hard to believe that the same scenario occurred exactly the same
> way in different areas,
> and that the pre-IE substrate was always insulated from the?? Who said that?
> ablauting Hochsprache by this Niedersprache.