Fw: Re: [tied] Re: Frankish origins

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, george knysh <gknysh@...> wrote:

>
> --- On Mon, 9/21/09, Torsten <tgpedersen@...> wrote:
>
> So I think I'll modify my conjecture to this: The Yazygi etc were
> mainly R with some G from early intermarriage (Vanir etc), but
> picked up someone else with haplogroup I in Tanais, which became
> dominant in their later travels.
>
> ****GK: I think you'd better wait for scientists to analyze some
> bones from the Yazigi graves in Hungary.

Why? If I did that there would no cause to make a conjecture.

> Otherwise your conjecture is pretty meaningless.

No, it's undecided.

> You can't really substitute an ad hoc assumption for an as yet
> total unknown and present this as even a working theory.

That's the definition of a conjecture.

> At best it's a question you might address to appropriate Hungarian
> scientific bodies.

I'm afraid I don't know any Hungarian. But you are welcome to write and ask them so we can find out whether my conjecture is true or not, in which case of course it ceases to be a conjecture.

> Ooops I forgot. It's not really a question of science but of
> scavenging for support of kookery...

Now George is getting abusive again.

> "Vanir" indeed (:=))) Haplogroup G no less! There is no end to a
> kook's inventiveness.

Maybe George has an allergy?

> Happy hunting Torsteinychku!*****

Thank you. And a happy censorship to you.


Torsten