Fw: [tied] Re: Roman auxiliary contingents

From: Torsten
Message: 65051
Date: 2009-09-18

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, george knysh <gknysh@...> wrote:
>
>
> --- On Fri, 9/18/09, danjmi <dmilt1896@...> wrote:
>
> From: danjmi <dmilt1896@...>

> --- In cybalist@... s.com, "danjmi" <dmilt1896@ ..> wrote:
> >
> > --- In cybalist@... s.com, george knysh <gknysh@> wrote:
> > >
> > > For those interested, there is an excellent study (based on the
> > > latest professional literature) of the evolution and
> > > composition of Roman auxiliary forces (including cavalry) from
> > > Republican through Imperial times.
> > >  
> > > Cf. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auxiliaries_(Roman_military)
> > >  
> > The address in George's posting fails because the close
> > parenthesis somehow is not part of it. Hope this corrects it.
> >
> Nope. Entire parenthetical phrase drops out in mine. So don't
> click; copy the entire line and paste.
>
> ****GK: I noticed that on the copy which came to me. Click again on
> "search for the page" when the first empty page comes up, and then
> click on "Roman auxiliary etc." when the third page opens. This
> will give you the relevant text. I don't know why the direct click
> failed. I copied it from the text page. In any case it's a matter
> of three quick clicks. Or Dan's system.****

This might work
http://tinyurl.com/mle7on


Torsten