From: george knysh
Message: 65050
Date: 2009-09-18
--- On Fri, 9/18/09, danjmi <dmilt1896@...> wrote:
From: danjmi <dmilt1896@...>
Subject: [tied] Re: Roman auxiliary contingents
To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, September 18, 2009, 3:14 PM
--- In cybalist@... s.com, "danjmi" <dmilt1896@. ..> wrote:
>
> --- In cybalist@... s.com, george knysh <gknysh@> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > For those interested, there is an excellent study (based on the latest professional literature) of the evolution and composition of Roman auxiliary forces (including cavalry) from Republican through Imperial times.
> >
> > Cf. http://en.wikipedia .org/wiki/ Auxiliaries_(Roman_military)
> >
> The address in George's posting fails because the close parenthesis somehow is not part of it. Hope this corrects it.
>
Nope. Entire parenthetical phrase drops out in mine. So don't click; copy the entire line and paste.
Dan
****GK: I noticed that on the copy which came to me. Click again on "search for the page" when the first empty page comes up, and then click on "Roman auxiliary etc." when the third page opens. This will give you the relevant text. I don't know why the direct click failed. I copied it from the text page. In any case it's a matter of three quick clicks. Or Dan's system.****