From: tgpedersen
Message: 64775
Date: 2009-08-17
>If this is the style you intend to use, this conversation stops right here.
> Apologies if this comes over multiple times. Yahoo is refusing me the sent-message confirmation.
>
> > > > > You're not paying attention. Let's go over this again - there
> > > > > are two Baltic-Finnic words here, and you seem to be confused
> > > > > as to what applies to what:
> > > > > *piki "pitch", a trivial loan from Germanic (which might
> > > > > itself be a substrate loan, but that's not relevant for BF)
> > > > > *pihka "resin", regularly cognate with Khanty *peG@...; this
> > > > > link means it cannot be a West European substrate loan, and
> > > > > confirms that the *h is from former *S.
> > > >
> > > > No, *you* are not paying attention. I said 'substrate loan',
> > > > not 'West European substrate loan'. A substrate common to
> > > > FU/Uralic and northern IE.
> > >
> > > How far do you think this stretches exactly?
> >
> > Oh well. I'll repeat myself. The language I'm talking about is Kuhn's ur-/ar- language and Schrijver's language of geminates and language of bird names, all three of which I think is one and the same language.
>
> Well, I've yet to spot any wider a/u alternation within Uralic substrate loans, and "having geminates" or "having names for birds" are not sufficient grounds for identifying a language.
>