From: caotope
Message: 64607
Date: 2009-08-05
> > > Bestia is borrowed from *beRsYtYab < *beRtYsYaB and be:lua <Few north of the Mediterranean however. (Indeed few uvulars of any sort, until the rise of the French/German/Portuguese/etc. uvular R.)
> > > *betYsYLaw < *betYsYRaB (with R = voiced uvular fricative, B =
> > > bilabial r).
> >
> > What the heck is that stuff supposed to be? *R suggests something
> Afro-Asiatic,
>
> How so? It is found in many languages.
> > but "bilabial R"!? The bilabial trill is only found in about three languages of Amazonas and two of Congo.Why not. Point being however that I'm surprized to see such a rare phoneme posited, and I'm curious how would you conclude the existence of such a sound? (Can we even conclude anything about its likely fate??)
>
> No, B also occurs in Fas (in New Guinea) and must be reconstructed for the common ancestor of Fas and (at least) most neighboring languages.
> The PIE sound d. > d.r. (and vice versa) and d.r. > r. optionally in all IE (*d.r.u-s.t.xo- > Alb d(r)ushk-; *d.us.- 'wrong' > Iranian *d.(r.)us.mYn.- > Bactrian lruhmin 'enemy', *d.akYrYu > *r.akYr.u dis> *akYr.u 'tear' in many (r.>R>X in Hittite))....Are those retroflexes in PIE?
> Also, B can be reconstructed in many languages (coming from r next to a (bi)labial or r/w next to a labiovelar), in most of which it optionally became either w or r, such as North Caucasian *!wïn?i 'belly':I might prefer *rW here, tho maybe it doesn't matter all that much.
> > ("Y" would presumably be the newest breikthru in How toYes, these are reasonable (tho I prefer the more parsimonious <S Z> for shibilants). <Y> just looks funny since I'm used to <y> being the lax close front rounded vowel, and <j> the palatal semivowel.
> > Transcribe Palatalization in a Nonstandard Fashion. ;)
>
> I reconstruct and discuss many sounds. In order to keep each symbol to one use, and not use many arbitrarily, I use ^ for s^ (sh or S) and sY (pal.), etc., as well as s. (retro.) and s' (glot.). Of course, since in some environments sW > sw, etc., writing sY > sy is convenient as well as orderly.