[SPAM] [SPAM] [tied] Re: Latin /a/ after labials, IE *mori

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "alexandru_mg3" <alexandru_mg3@...> wrote:

>
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Piotr Gasiorowski <gpiotr@> wrote:
> >
> > On 2009-06-13 01:01, alexandru_mg3 wrote:
> >
> > > One similar example, is vale:re :
> > >
> > > This is an -eh1-stative, formed as usual, from the zero-grade
> > > *wlh2-eh1-that gives *vala:re ==> with regular -h2-eh1- > a: ....
> > >
> > > BUT the word is vale:re so it was reshaped in e: => vale:re in order to
> > > retain the stative suffix e:
> > >
> > > THIS CLEARLY SHOW YOU THAT A RESHAPE PROCESS TOOK PLACE.
> >
> > There's very little similarity. The IE "essive" present of <valeo:,
> > vale:re> was *wl.h(2?)-h1je/o-.
> > Piotr
> >

Not true, the 'current accepted' reconstruction is *wlh2-eh1-
Please check.

Also h2- is in the root please check too.

Marius