[SPAM] [tied] Re: Latin /a/ after labials, IE *mori

From: alexandru_mg3
Message: 63979
Date: 2009-06-01

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "alexandru_mg3" <alexandru_mg3@...> wrote:
>
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Piotr Gasiorowski <gpiotr@> wrote:
> >
> > On 2009-05-31 14:46, alexandru_mg3 wrote:
> >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------
> > > > There is no "root *menh2-/*mneh2-".
> > >
> > > Did you here about CERH-/CREH- roots?
> >
> > The whole Schwebeablaut idea was demolished by Raimo Anttila in his 1969
> > book. A PIE root may have either form, but not both of them at one time.
> > We have *g^neh3- 'know' and *telh2- 'support', but no *g^enh3- or
> > *tleh2-. Even an "extended root" has only one vowel slot, not two.
> > may have late analogical forms or vr.ddhied derivatives with *e infixed
> > in the "wrong" place (the *deiwo- type), but <moneo:> is neither of
> > these.
>
>

I repost this part due to some Characters codes


-----------------------------------------------------------------
Why is neither of these? when is exactly like this....


Some similar examples for you:

----------------------------------------------------------
Goth. kno:dai [dat.sg.f.] 'family' *g^noh1-
Skt jña:ti 'kinsman *g^noh1-ti-
Latv. znuõts 'son-in-law' *g^noh1-t-
----------------------------------------------------------

All these examples reflects *g^neh1- a TYPE-B of the root g^enh1- 'to beget'


-----------------------------------------------------------------


Marius