From: alexandru_mg3
Message: 63958
Date: 2009-05-29
> > A) mane:re falls in the rule above so we regularly have:Some non-zero-grade -eh1- forms:
> >
> > 1. *mon-éh1- > mane:re
>
> That's how Schrijver explains it, but not how IE fientives are formed.
> The expected grade is zero, not *o.
> > BUT In this Context *mon-éye would have been resulted again as *mane:reIf for you is Ok to have in the same language mane:re 'to remain' and mane:re 'to warn' and to continue to use them like this for the next 200 years than is 'ad-hoc' for sure.
> > 'to warn' but Semantically is different from mane:re 'to stay' : so is
> > normal to be retained/restored as an o-causative mone:re
>
> This is an ad hoc explanation.
> > B. mora 'pause, delay' is from the root *merh- so it was *morh-eh2Matassovic agrees with me:
> > And in this case, we have a closed syllable here: *mor-heh2
>
> No, the Indo-Iranian treatment of the root (Skt. perf. sasma:ra <
> se-smór-e, adj. smr.tá- 'remembered' < *smr.tó-) rules out a final
> laryngeal.
> Piotr