Re: Sos-

>
> ========
> The first issue is the absence of relationship between fish-roe,
> excrement, calf of leg, vulva and the rest.
> Before talking about substrate, it would be nice to have a "word"
> and a word is basically a "meaning" plus a "sound" (plus a
> syntactical class)
> There's no meaning here.
> A.
> ==========

The meaning is "inferior meat", that which hunter-gatherers can
obtain, seen from the point of view of those who can produce better
meat; the rest is derivative.

========

Could you explicit the relationships between : fish-roe, excrement, calf of
leg, vulva, prostitute, piss, to begin with ?

I cannot see how these meanings fit in your "inferior meat" scenario.

A.

==========

> > The word "urine" is pan-Uralic
>
> Which Schrijver seems to ignore, although he quotes UEW, which leads
> him to claim independence for the substrate he finds.
>
> =======
> Lumping together words without any analysis is an absurd method.
> It's absurdity not independence.
> A.
> =======

Did you read what I wrote?

=======
I did
I usually do.
A.
=======