Re: Belgs

>
> I'm afraid you are falling from nephelococcygian into oinococcygian.
> Have you had a recent orgy with M. Kalevi Wiik ?
>=======

Usually I make my mind up on what I should be reading at next based on
the degree of inanity of the blather people are willing to emit in
order to keep me away from it.

=====
Indeed,
you have a definite tropism for absurdity.
and it shows.
A.
======

> Appellative occurrences of volg-
> Uralic
> http://tinyurl.com/a7fptz
>
> ====
> The reconstruction is bad as usual.
> Better is CuH-il-
> C can be either w- or N-

I get it from UEW that the edh is there in order to explain the umlaut
of the Hungarian gloss. If that is left out, we might posit (?*n,Wul-

>) *n,WuGl- > *wulg- vel sim-, which is more like what you want.

=====
I beg your pardon !?

*Wulg does not explain any of the attested Uralic forms.

A.
=====

> How do you connect Uralic *wuHil and PIE *welg- ?
>

I think one should connect one's own reconstructions.
Mine was Uralic *walg-/*wulg-.
Torsten

====

Keep on dreaming.

A.