Re: Velar vs Uvular (was: Verdict on Mann)

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Arnaud Fournet" <fournet.arnaud@...>
wrote:

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "stlatos" <stlatos@...>
> To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 4:50 AM
> Subject: [tied] Velar vs Uvular (was: Verdict on Mann)

> I disagree. In Khowar plain velars changed o > a or prevented a > A
> (low back V) > O > o, as in *sxàL+ > *s.àl > s.òr 'salty', *n+ >
> *uns.xàl+ > wexàl 'unsalty'.

> Do you have an example

Here are some examples from


http://users.sedona.net/~strand/lngFrameL.html



m'o N. this one [= hamo]. [m-o] [Skt. im'am 'this [accusative]'
T. 587]

ham'o N. this one [obl.]. [ha-m-o]

hamaGa'r N. from this one. [ha-m-o-G-ar]


kamb'ox N. branch. [kamb'ox] [Skt. * kamp-a-ka- 'shaking' T.
2766]


aw'a N. I. [awa] [Skt. ah'am 'I' T. 992]