From: Piotr Gasiorowski
Message: 61533
Date: 2008-11-11
> >> [PG:] There could be no original Brugmannian lengthening in_And_, if it had an s-aorist in PIE (cf. Lat. auxi:), it was
> >> such roots as *h2weks- (= *hweg-s-),
>
> > [TP:] That's a possible generalization of an s-aorist of *awg-
> > which is a class VI verb.
>
> No, it's Class VII: *aukanã, *eauk, *eaukun, *aukanaz (ON
> <auka>, <jók>, <jóku>, <aukinn>; Goth. <aukan>, <aíauk>,
> <aíukum>, <aukans>).