From: Arnaud Fournet
Message: 61003
Date: 2008-10-18
----- Original Message -----
From: "dgkilday57" <dgkilday57@...>
>
> I don't know if it's been point at,
> but such a syntagm as *ad-caput-pet-
> should be followed by -â- in Latin,
> like in prae-caput-â- > precipita-te
> In that case, accipi-pit- should be **accipitâ-rius or the like.
That is a different adjectival formation.
========
Well,
you have not shown an example of a compound name like *ad-caput-pet- :
preposition + name + verb that was not followed by -â-.
Does it exist in the first place ?
Arnaud
===========
> I can't see what's wrong with a simple fast-flyer > accipiter ?
What generates the geminate?
DGK
========
There are plenty of examples in Latin of words that have geminates or don't.
I think words without geminates are the regular development in Latin.
acci- has a geminate as can be expected from a "rural" word.
Arnaud
=========