From: Brian M. Scott
Message: 59892
Date: 2008-08-28
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "indravayu" <sonno3@...>If you'd bothered to read the passage in question, you'd
> wrote:
>>>> Gambrivii - likely related to Old High German gambar
>>>> "vigorous".
>>> And the Germanic and IE cognates are?
>> Ummm...didn't I just give you one (OHD gambar)?
> Yes, and I asked for the rest.
>> See the following article for more info, including
>> etymological speculation:
>> http://books.google.com/books?
>> id=mjnpsC6Lq4QC&pg=PA407&lpg=PA407&dq=gambar,+gambrivii&
>> source=web&ots=XKEG8QCNln&sig=T1_UBzubG5Ww3AOq1R0WX5KeJvI&hl=en&
>> sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=4&ct=result
> You should use tinyurl.
> There is no way around the conclusion that Gambrivii and
> Sugambri are related. If those names are Germanic, so is
> su-, which makes it a once-only in Germanic. Not tenable.
>>> The -w-/-b- alternation presents an unexplained problem.Oh? What's the earliest extant ms. of Tacitus?
>>> It seems to be connected to the Veneti (see earlier
>>> posts).
>> It was not uncommon for -v- and -b- to be confused in
>> Latin texts.
> This is too early for that.
>>>> Vandilii seems like it is derived from Gmnc *wandilozIf it's derived from a <-jan> verb, the o-grade is expected.
>>>> "wanderer".
>>> Supposedly connected to PIE *wendh-. The -a-, like that
>>> of Vandili, is unexplained.
>> According to whom?
> According to me. But it's a general problem in traditional
> Germanic etymology; people assume various ablaut grades
> without any external reason.