From: Piotr Gasiorowski
Message: 59618
Date: 2008-07-22
>It might work for some of the items, but surely not for Gk. Ne:reús.
>
> At 12:35:12 PM on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, A. wrote:
> > In light of this evidence does it seem valid to suggest
> > that all are derived from *Ner(1)- , meaning "under"?
>
> Why not a basis in the cluster *h2ner- 'man', *h2ner-to-
> 'virile, strong', etc.?