From: jsjonesmiami
Message: 58856
Date: 2008-05-25
>wrote:
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "jsjonesmiami" <jsjonesmiami@>
> >Thanks for the reply. First, I'd better first point out that I'm not
> > I don't think there's any automatic positive correlation between
> > linguistic conservatism and geographic continuity. In fact, some
> > linguists have suggested that the opposite occurs, based on
> > dialect distribution of colonial languages (and maybe some other
> > things).
> >
> > >
> > I don't think (A) is very tenable, regardless of the homeland's
> > location, but it would cause problems for the Indian homeland
> > hypothesis, in that the centum languages would have to all leave
> > in a single group, while Germanic has much in common with
> > Balto-Slavic and Greek with Indo_Iranian.
> >
> > For (B) and (C), I don't see anything relevent to the question,
> > although I'll mention that I don't see the earmarks of
> > unidirectional expansion either.
>
> I concede that my reasoning may have been erroneous. I'm not as
> knowledgeable as most of the other regular contributors and
> therefore may tend to put forth knee-jerk reactive statements basedMy reply to your post wasn't completely relevent to it, as I noted.
> on limited knowledge and limited consideration, whose logic,
> substantiability, or relevance may be questionable.
> I will try to censor such responses as I'm aware that it doesn'tI think there's a need for multiple levels of discussion. Even those
> really belong at this level of discussion.
>
> Andrew