Re: PIE initial *a

----- Original Message -----
From: "fournet.arnaud" <fournet.arnaud@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: [tied] Re: PIE initial *a


>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Patrick Ryan" <proto-language@...>
> >> ========
> >>
> >> This is a way to distinguish e and o,
> >> from laryngeal schwas.
> >> This does not mean *e and *o are one thing.
> >>
> >> Arnaud
> >>
> >> =============
> >
> >
> > ***
> >
> > Patrick:
> >
> > Mauvais comme d'habitude, Arnaud.
> >
> > Thematic *e/*o has _nothing_ to do with 'laryngeals' nor schwa.
> >
> ==========
>
> I would be nice if you could keep you bad French for yourself
> especially when you misunderstand what people say.
>
> I precisely said the thematic vowels e/o which alternate with one another
> had nothing to do with LAryngeals or schwas.
>
> Arnaud
>
> ============



***

Patrick:

"you bad French _for_ yourself"????

Why do you not keep your bad English to yourself?


***


> >> > ***
> >>
> >> English has maintained at least since 2000 year
> >> the distinction between voiced th (as in <the>)
> >> and voiceless th (as in <thick>)
> >> Your entropy law is refuted.
> >>
> >> Arnaud
> >
> > ***
> >
> > Patrick:
> >
> > Brian has kindly answered that for me.
> >
> > Thank you, Brian.
> >
> ===========
>
> Brian has not rejected my point of view
> as a matter of fact,
> what he says is not in your favor,
> even though you misunderstood everything as usual.
>
> Arnaud
>
> ==========
>
>
>
>
>
>