From: george knysh
Message: 58211
Date: 2008-04-29
> > >****GK: As I remember, archaeologists used the
> > > Could you name them? I'm reading Okulicz and
> Gol/a,b on the
> > > subject and would like to see the geographical
> context.
> >
> > GK: The basic Baltic culture north of Milograd
> is
> > called "the stroked ceramic culture" in my
> sources.To
> > the east of Milograd, there was the "Yukhnov
> culture".
>
> And in what way were they Baltic?
>****GK: Actually they are the same culture, straddling
> > I remember reading a good book by Marija Gimbutas
> > ["The Balts"]which is probably still relevant on
> this
> > issue. Newer literature has not altered the
> > basics.
>
> Great read. I read it some years back.
>
>
> > > > It is nearly identical to the Pidhirtsi
> culture of Ukraine
> > > > (considered Baltic),
> > >
> > > Wikipedia claims Mylohrad and Pidhirtsi are
> other names for
> > > Milograd, which by some claimed to be Baltic, by
> others to be
> > > Slavic.
> >
> >
> > GK: Maybe "BaltoSlavic" would be best. BTW
> > Milograd/Pidhirtsi were Herodotus' "Neuri"
>
> Now you confuse me. Are Milograd and Pidhirtsi
> separate cultures, and
> if yes, where were they situated?
>____________________________________________________________________________________
>
> Torsten
>
>
>