From: george knysh
Message: 58182
Date: 2008-04-29
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, george knysh****GK: The basic Baltic culture north of Milograd is
> <gknysh@...> wrote:
> >
> >
> > --- tgpedersen <tgpedersen@...> wrote:
> >
> > > --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, george knysh
> > > <gknysh@> wrote:
> > > > --- tgpedersen <tgpedersen@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Nice. I propose that Milograd was Finnic,
> then.
> > > > > That'll give us the Finnnic substrate I need
> for Slavic.
> > > >
> > > > GK: Find it somewhere else. Milograd was
> Baltic, not
> > > > Finnic.
> > >
> > > Because ... ?
> > >
>
> > GK: The material culture is closely related to
> > similar ones north,west,and east, all considered
> > Baltic.
>
> Could you name them? I'm reading Okulicz and Gola,b
> on the subject and
> would like to see the geographical context.
>****GK: Maybe "BaltoSlavic" would be best. BTW
>
> > It is nearly identical to the Pidhirtsi
> > culture of Ukraine (considered Baltic),
>
> Wikipedia claims Mylohrad and Pidhirtsi are other
> names for Milograd,
> which by some claimed to be Baltic, by others to be
> Slavic.
>____________________________________________________________________________________
>
> Torsten
>
>
>