Re: Transcriptions

From: Przemysław Ziobrowski
Message: 58152
Date: 2008-04-28

george_st@... ta nugatu-r:

>>3. The thing is, George had problems with _o-double acute_ and
>>_u-double acute_ which, of course, are present in ISO-8859-2. If
>>he hadn't he wouldn't need substitutes.

> Exactly. Let's test them:

> ooo, OOO, uuu, UUU

These were displayed correctly because, this time, you encoded your
message in ISO-8859-1. Now they're not (replaced by _o O_ and _u U_ resp.)
because my e-mail client automatically has changed encoding to ISO-8859-2.

> á, é, í, ó, ú

OK. Both, ISO-8859-1 and ISO-8859-2 contain these char(acter)s.

> â, ê, î, ô, û

Double acuted vowels not visible (replaced by codes 234 and 251, resp.)
for an "obvious" reason --> ISO-8859-1 doesn't have them.


Cześć! (not _czeszcz_ ^_^)

--
Przemysław Ziobrowski
"To jest tak proste, że nie można tego zrozumieć"
przysłowie qirańskie