From: george knysh
Message: 57845
Date: 2008-04-22
>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/31974
> > > What did you mean by 'vaguely Sarmatian'?
> > >
> >
>
> >****GK: One would have to study the objects very
> > GK: At that time(2004) I used the term
> "Sarmatian"
> > more loosely, for all "non-Scythian" Iranic
> > populations of the Eurasian steppes (minus the
> Yuezhi
> > I think). By "vaguely Sarmatian" I meant a
> solitary
> > object vaguely similar to such as could be found
> in
> > identifiably "Sarmatian" graves. One occasionally
> > finds such objects in "non-Sarmatian" burials.
> They
> > are meaningless from the point of view of ethnic
> > identity, just as a Roman sword or helmet in an
> > otherwise Germanic grave would not necessarily
> > indicate that a Roman was buried there, even
> though in
> > the latter case the similarity was much more than
> > "vague"...
> > >
>
> Let me rephrase.
> Can those objects which appear in the Lubieszewo
> graves be placed in a
> morpho-temporal sequence such that preforms of them
> exist already in
> pre-Roman Przeworsk non-princely graves (I'm trying
> to sound like a
> German archaeologist here), or do they (or some of
> them) appear to
> represent something new and hitherto unknown?
>
>
> Torsten
>____________________________________________________________________________________
>
>