Re: Re[2]: [tied] Re: On the ordering of some PIE rules

From: fournet.arnaud
Message: 57773
Date: 2008-04-21

----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian M. Scott" <BMScott@...>
To: "fournet.arnaud" <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2008 10:27 PM
Subject: [Courrier indsirable] Re[2]: [tied] Re: On the ordering of some PIE
rules


> At 3:54:21 PM on Sunday, April 20, 2008, fournet.arnaud
> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> Pokorny 67 arkw "arc, flèche"
>> Latin arcus "arc"
>> Germanique *arxwo: "flèche"
>> Grec ardis "flèche"
>> The Greek word does not have the -kw / q suffix.
>
> And does not belong to Pokorny's *arqu-. Beekes suggests
> *h2erd- 'point', making it cognate with OIr <aird> 'point,
> extremity, direction' < PCelt. *ardi-. ON <erta> 'to taunt'
> < *artjan could go here as well.
>
> Brian
>
============

I'll be happy with putting together words that mean "arrow",

I won't have your "taunt, direction, arrow" salad.

Arnaud

===========