From: Rick McCallister
Message: 57658
Date: 2008-04-19
> Dear all,If you write something claiming the Mahabharata was
>
> I think it is time we maintain some decorum on this
> group and ban
> all non academic issues such as abusing others,
> discussing
> personalities, questioning the credentials and so
> on.
>
> Let us assume that I post on dating on MBh, saying
> that the event
> has occured in 3000 bce, there is not a single post
> that logically
> discusses the acceppted main stream thoughts - no
> one even discusses
> the language and dating of composition of MBh (which
> is obviously
> much much later to the event itself!)
>
> Similarly, there is a huge difference between the
> original Mbh
> (called Jayam) and the Mbh of today's version,
> compiled mostly by
> Ugrasravas,a bard of probably south India. However,
> linguistically,
> there is no post discussing the difference.
>
> Instead of writing nonsensical rebuttals, which will
> not take us
> anywhere, I expect academic rebuttals, which
> certainly require some
> kind of patience and hard work on the part of the
> linguists here. I
> crave such obligations from my friends here.
>
> i am appalled.
>
> Kishore patnaik
>