From: fournet.arnaud
Message: 57537
Date: 2008-04-17
----- Original Message -----
From: "kishore patnaik" <kishorepatnaik09@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 12:41 PM
Subject: Re: Re: [tied] More by Bryant
> >
>> Witzel whom I 'm ready to believe more than any astrogrpher or
>> astrographer
>> explains that this date of 3102BC is an invention of Va:ra:hamihira circa
>> 500 AD,
>> on the basis of a back-calculation.
>> This datation is therefore worthless.
>> Arnaud
>
>
> What exactly you expect varha mihira or Aryabhatta to do?
=========
I expect nothing from people I don't know.
Maybe you are in a better position to explain something.
Arnaud
=========
btw, what > Mitzel is doing?
========
I suppose you mean Witzel ?
Arnaud
=====
> Certainly, you did not expect a coin minted by Krishna to announce " Hi, I
> was minted in 3102 bce!", did you?
=======
I don't think real things can be bear a reference to posterior events.
Arnaud
========
If you are closed to ideas from other scientific realms (btw, astonomy of
Varaha mihira and Aryabhatta is more
> exact science than today's so called socio or historical linguistics,
> which
> are more probabalistic valuations and in any case, based on subjected
> assumptions.
=======
I don't think this rubbish is another scientific realm.
It's rubbish.
Arnaud
========
> you need not announce your name in every paragraph.
========
It seems to be highly useful
as you are tinkering with who said what.
Arnaud
========