----- Original Message -----
From: "stlatos" <stlatos@...>
>> All these long unexplained lists in your message! What do they prove?
> What do you mean by 'unexplained'? I've given lists of hundreds of
>rules before. For these examples there's some metathesis, and I
>explain a few other rules, but is it necessary to say well-known
>changes like kW>k or tt>st or ks>ks., etc?
Your mails are rather hard to read, not to say understand.
Did you feed on punch cards when a student ?