Re: Not "catching the wind " , or, what ARE we discussing?

----- Original Message -----
From: "fournet.arnaud" <fournet.arnaud@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 12:02 PM
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re:Re: [tied] Re: Not "catching the wind " , or, what
ARE we discussing?


>
> > ***
> >
> > Patrick:
> >
> > 'gray' is analyzed *g^he-, 'bare' *H, STATIVE + -*re-, 'color' + *-*y,
> > 'like'
> >
> > Kudos. Got one almost right!
> >
> >
> > ***
>
> I suppose you believe in what you write.
>
> Poor man.
>
> Berserk is a weak word.
>
> Arnaud
>
> ============


***

Patrick:

You have never looked at the evidence, and never will.

You are, apparently, _only_ capable of outrageous suggestions based on one
sample or two.

I am willing to defend any position I hold with arguments based on data.

If you ever have an arguement rather than just another slight, let me know.


***