From: tgpedersen
Message: 57231
Date: 2008-04-13
>That's what I'm trying to figure out. I think a large part of the
> > ================
> >
> > >It would be necessary in the first place to be sure that Huns are
> > >not just Germanic or para-Germanic.
> > >
> >> Arnaud
> >
> > ================
>
> >That's a dumb thing to say. Look at Ket and compare it to Germanic.
> >Torsten
>
> =========
>
> Yes but
> in your hypothesis that Germanic became Germanic because it was
> adopted by non originally Germanic speakers, How do you know what
> survived and what was discarded from the previous n-1 stage ?