Re: Hachmann versus Kossack?

--- tgpedersen <tgpedersen@...> wrote:

>
> > >
> > > GK: BTW AF has sent me a defence of his
> "Asiatic
> > > Germans" position. Purely linguistic. Is there
> any
> > > reason why he can't propose this to the cybalist
> > > community? He says he's "under embargo", but
> another
> > > post of his has just appeared here...
> > > >
> > > >
> > For his proposal to work, I'd expect to see a
> > substantial Uralic adstrate in Gmc, probably some
> > parallels with Tokharian.
>
> Hm. How much adstrate would we see if the upper
> layer of the
> Ariovistus expansion were renegades from
> Mithridates' polyglot army?

****GK: How much adstrate did we see in Germanic as a
result of their leading groups' close connection with
the Huns?****





__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com