From: tgpedersen
Message: 56451
Date: 2008-04-02
>Why do you think they become Celtic by your decreeing them to be that?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: tgpedersen
> >
> > The Grimm/Verner/Kluge complex of changes is uniquely Germanic and
> > can be conveniently regarded as the defining autapomorphy of the
> > group.
>
> Nice try. Kluge does not belong there. Firstly, it's logically
> detachable from Grimm/Verner, secondly, I hear that it occurs in
> Celtic too, and thirdly, Kuhn was only able to find half a dozen
> geminates in the Gothic Bible, so Kluge, or substrate from a
> geminating language didn't happen in East Germanic. It's a
> NWGermanic thing, it becomes increasing common in the North and West
> Germanic languages over time, and the Chatti, a local non-Germanic,
> non-Celtic tribe has geminates in the few opaque words we know of
> it. Everything points to Chattic substrate.
>
> Torsten
> ================
> Nice try as well, on your side.
>
> The odd thing about Kluge's Law is then
> that this law is discovered in Germanic
> but relates in fact to a Celtic Substrate.
> Your repeated assertion that Chatti are not Celtic is unsupported.Your repeated assertions that points of view other than your own are
> What opaque words do we know from Chatti ?I cite from