From: george knysh
Message: 56278
Date: 2008-03-30
>****GK: We're obviously talking about different things
> >(GK) I feel certain that the specifics you are
> interested in are
> > discussed in the books the article constantly
> refers to, with
> > appropriate further citations. Perhaps they are
> > available in your librarie(s). Many Polish
> editions
> > have German and English summaries.
>
> I have a hunch they don't.
> not the Poles'****GK: Don't Hachmann or Pestel include them in the
> strong side. Most Germans working on prehistory had
> an infatuation
> with Scandinavian stuff and many taught themselves
> the language(s).
>
> > >
> > > 2) It is tempting to equate non-IE(?) Chatti
> with
> > > the Cotini/PĂșchov
> > > mixed culture. Are there reasons one shouldn't?
> >
> > GK: Well, two off the top: different arch.
> > cultures, different peoples acc. to Tacitus.
>
> How different archaeologically? Kuhn etc seem to
> think the Chatti were
> something pre-Germanic,
> Cotini in Moravia****GK: While the Chatti were Germanic in his
> were Celtic, not Germanic.
>****GK: I don't see what the problem would be. It
>
> > > 3) It's further tempting to connect
> Vandili/Vendsyssel/Veneti in
> > > Gaul: the Limfjord south of Vendsyssel was the
> preferred
> > > sailing route to the Baltic, not until Hansa
> Ummelandsfarer with
> > > large cogs did shipping take the dangerous route
> north of Skagen.
> >
> > GK: Resist the temptation.
>
> It is common lore in Danish archaeology that there
> is a archaeological
> connection between vendsyssel and the mouth of the
> Oder.
> kind of blind spot wrt. Scandinavia I was referring****GK: I'm not denying anything except a concern
> to. That makes me
> suspicious of whether your denial of a connection
> with the Veneti of
> Gaul is on equally shaky ground.
>****GK: So there was "internal" variety.***
>
> > > 4) 'The evolution of the power structure within
> the Germanic
> > > societies in Poland and elsewhere can be traced
> to some degree
> > > by examining the "princely" graves - burials of
> chiefs, and even
> > > hereditary princes, as the consolidation of
> power progressed.
> > > Those appeaR from the beginning of the Common
> Era and are located
> > > away from ordinary cemeteries, singly or in
> small groups. The
> > > bodies were inhumed in wooden coffins and
> covered with kurgans, or
> > > interred in wooden or stone chambers.
> > > Luxurious Roman-made gifts and fancy barbarian****GK: The same question could be asked with respect
> emulations ... ,
> > > but not weapons, were placed in the graves. 1st
> and 2nd century
> > > burials of this type, occurring all the way from
> Jutland to
> > > Lesser Poland, are referred to as princely
> graves Lubieszewo type,
> > > after Lubieszewo, Gryfice County in western
> Pomerania, where six
> > > such burials were found.'
> > >
> > > Here's the question that *you* don't like: where
> does this sudden
> > > homogeneous upper class come from? Why does it
> use inhumation, not
> > > cremation, as was the custom before?
> similar to any other****GK: The text doesn't say that.****
> > > culture in the neighborhood?
> >
> > ****GK: It would be helpful to relate these graves
> to specific
> > Germanic populations.
>
> I think the text says, which I've read elsewhere
> too, that you can't.
> It's a new and homogenous upper class, appearing****GK: Like the Scythian royal barrows of the VIth c.
> suddenly in an until
> then egalitarian culture.
>****GK: It's the Ruegen burials that give the
> > Presumably more information would be available in
> the books
> > mentioned.
>
> You don't know. OK.
>
> > All I get from the article is that these W.
> Pomeranian graves are
> > associated with a group which arrived ca. 30 CE
> from from Ru/"/gen
> > to replace the local Oksywie culture which had
> earlier replaced the
> > Jastorf culture, and that it was itself replaced
> by another
> > group in the 3rd.c.****
>
> It's not a phenomenon specific to the Wielbark
> culture.
>____________________________________________________________________________________
>
> > >
> > > 5) 'Related to the Przeworsk culture was the
> Wietrzno-Solina type,
> > > a cultural unit with Celtic and then Dacian
> elements, situated
> > > within the more eastern part of the Beskids
> range (San River
> > > basin) during the 100-250 CE period[24][25].'
> > >
> > > Saxo's Ruthenians?
> >
> > GK: Who knows? In any case some of Ptolemy's
> > tribal names might be consulted
>
> If it is, one might have to read Saxo's prehistoric
> stuff from that
> perspective.
>
>
> Torsten
>
>
>