Re: Finnish KASKI

You have some of the most bizarre correspondences!

PIE *t should be Egyptian <s>??????

Show me that pair of regular correspondences in any two languages in the
world.


Patrick

----- Original Message -----
From: "fournet.arnaud" <fournet.arnaud@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 7:54 AM
Subject: Re: Re: [tied] Re: Finnish KASKI


>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Patrick Ryan
> To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 1:08 PM
> Subject: [Courrier indésirable] Re: [tied] Re: Finnish KASKI
>
>
> It may be of interest to a few that this word is unusual in that the
> 'laryngeals' normally appear in Egyptian as <j> or <h> but in this one
> word,
> it seems to appear as <x> (I.e. hook-h): <xnt(y)>.
>
> Patrick
>
> ================
>
> There is a coincidence between
> PIE *H2ent-i
> and
> Egyptian *x_n_t "
>
> But these two words are unconnected
> because *x is generally PIE *k
> and PIE *t should be *s
>
> So nothing useful can come out of this.
>
> Arnaud
>
> =============
>
>
>
>
>
>