--- In
cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "fournet.arnaud"
<fournet.arnaud@...> wrote:
>
*nüdi `handle, grip' > Mk ned
- - - - - - -
SO YOU CHANGED YOUR MIND, NOW ned IS REGULAR AFTER ALL. A few days
ago you gave: näd and asked me to expalain it.
See also my message 55998
Jouppe
- - - - - - - - -
> Some of your words don't seem to exist !?
> the original scheme was u_i.
> Arnaud
> ===============
- - - - - - - - - -
I'll help you out again, I thought Moksha was your home turf?:
*mün,ä- `with (after, behind)' (Mk me-l'ä 'later, after that, then')
(Mk me-ki 'back, again, backwards')
*n'üktä `pluck, rip, harvest linen' (Mk n'eft'@ms id.)
*süli `lap' (Mk s'el' 'fathom')
*üli `over, above' (Mk vel'f 'beyond; through, by, over above'
Mk vel'd'ä 'through, by')
Jouppe
- - - - - - - - - -
>
> Irrgular ones for Moksha (conditioned?) you will find in words like:
> *küs'i `ask' > Mk kize
> *küji `viper' > Mk kuj
> *pün,i `hazel-grouse' > Mk pownä
> *s'üklä `wart, nipple' > Mk tsilgä
> *s'üks'i `autumn' > Mk sjoksja
> *ükti `1' > Mk fkä (stress on 2d)
> *üji `night' > Mk ve
> *vüdimi `nucleus, marrow' > Mk uj
>
> Quite obviously these reconstructions are inadequate
> and the problem is not conditioned changes.
> It's more serious.
>
> Arnaud
> =============
>
- - - - - - - - - - - -
There are a dozen more languages to fit the data. Sometimes Finnish
is the odd man out, sometimes Moksha, each on its turn.
Jouppe