From: fournet.arnaud
Message: 55911
Date: 2008-03-25
----- Original Message -----
From: Piotr Gasiorowski
On 2008-03-25 03:05, Miguel Carrasquer Vidal wrote:
> Besides Hitt. sak(u)wa- "eye" (< PA *sogWo- < PIE *sókWo-)
> [with irregular t- in the Luwian branch], there's also Hitt.
> suwais "bird", possibly connected to <avis> etc.
If <suwais> is related to <avis> (I have some new ideas concerning its
etymology, but I'm still working on it and wouldn't like to divulge the
details prematurely), the loss of *h2 is of course regular between an
s-mobile and a consonant. Hitt. sakuwa is, in my opinion, best explained
as a a thematic deverbal noun from *sekW- 'follow, join, accompany'
(with secondary meanings like 'see'). Any original connection with
*h3okW- is IMO doubtful despite the similarity of both roots and their
semantic convergence.
Piotr
=============
There is the big grab-everything root :
- sekw to say
- sekw to follow
- sekw to see
I have no opinion about "to say"
which may be the only one
which really is *s_kw
to follow is in my opinion
s plus -kw "with"
Basically this "verb" is just
a nominal syntagm
Noun1 s-kw + noun2 (in locative)
Noun1 is with noun2
this "verb" just does not exist.
S-H1_kw is another third thing.
Maybe or probably.
Arnaud
===========