Re: dhuga:ter ('LARYNGEALS')

----- Original Message -----
From: "fournet.arnaud" <fournet.arnaud@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2008 10:54 AM
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: [tied] Re: dhuga:ter ('LARYNGEALS')


>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Patrick Ryan
>
>
> > > ============
>
> > do not voice consonants
> > Patrick
> >
> > ***
> >
> > What is your alternative theory
> > to account for the obvious case of
> >
> > Latin bib-
> > and
> > Faliscan pipaf-
> >
> > pipH3-
> >
> > Arnaud
> > ============
>
> If it is so "obvious", how about a couple of other 'voicings"?
> Then I will try to explain it.
> Patrick
>
> ============
>
> I think you first have to make
> you own point clear.
>
> This is a benchmark example.
>
> If you manage to break it,
> I suppose you'll get other examples
> from well-informed people.
>
> Arnaud
>
> =============

***

You cannot consider yourself intelligent if you generalize from one example.

You assert "voicing" on the basis of the one example you think you know.

Perhaps it was a linguistic miracle - the raising of the voice.


Patrick