Re: dhuga:ter

Any?

Sorry, we cannot even begin to analyze something it is not something but
anything.

Surely you see that.


Patrick

----- Original Message -----
From: "fournet.arnaud" <fournet.arnaud@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2008 8:58 AM
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: [tied] Re: dhuga:ter


>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Patrick Ryan
> To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2008 12:11 PM
> Subject: [Courrier indésirable] Re: Re: Re: [tied] Re: dhuga:ter
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "fournet.arnaud" <fournet.arnaud@...>
> To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2008 5:53 AM
> Subject: Re: Re: Re: [tied] Re: dhuga:ter
>
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Patrick Ryan
> >
> > Well, let us cut this down to manageable size.
> >
> > Prove to me than PIE *z existed.
> >
> > Patrick
> > ======================
>
> Maybe
> I should have first asked
> what is needed
> to amount for a *proof* ?
>
> Arnaud
> ==========
>
> ***
>
> tell me: what
> language is *dzaw?
>
> ***
>
> *dzaw ?
>
> Any proto-language ancestor to PIE.
>
> Arnaud
>
> ================
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>